The proliferation of various media platforms has fundamentally altered how we take in and pass along information. Individuals now can produce and disseminate material on a worldwide scale, thereby molding public debate and exerting an influence on popular culture.
This issue has been further magnified by the rise of social media platforms which enable the quick and extensive sharing of information and ideas.
Thus, conventional information gatekeepers, such as news outlets and government organizations, have been forced to adjust to the changing reality of the information landscape.
During the most recent months, and especially leading up to the election, a great deal of misleading materials and information have been alarmingly disseminated across social media platforms causing uncertainty among the general public.
This demonstrates the importance of having higher levels of media literacy as well as skills in critical thinking to resist the spread of false information. Before passing along the information to other people, individuals need to verify its accuracy first.
With this, technology seems to understand the assignment as seen by the enormous progress it has made toward achieving its mission of improving people's lives.
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques like ChatGPT has made it much easier to determine whether or not a piece of information is reliable.
The chatbot, which is driven by artificial intelligence (AI), claims that it can instantly verify the information and refute lies using reputable sources, which would make a helpful tool for the general public.
The natural language processing (NLP) features that are built into ChatGPT give the tool the ability to comprehend human inquiries and reply to them in a conversational manner.
This makes it simple for users to fact-check information while they are on the move. In addition, because it can learn from the actions and comments of its users, it is becoming an increasingly accurate and dependable instrument over time.
However, there is still a difficulty with the use of AIs in fact-checking because they are only able to rely on the information that they have been programmed with, and they may not be able to detect subtle types of propaganda or misinformation.
This exemplifies the significance of human fact-checkers in maintaining the credibility of information and assuring its accuracy. Due to the possibility that automated fact-checking technologies will be unable to recognize some nuances and contexts that can only be recognized by a human, the function of human fact-checkers is essential for ensuring that the information provided to the public is accurate. In addition, human fact-checkers can add a layer of responsibility and transparency to the process of information transmission.
Even though artificial intelligence programs are capable of fast processing and analyzing vast volumes of data, they still lack the human ability to comprehend the context and make subjective judgments, both of which are essential when checking facts.
As a result, it's possible that the most efficient strategy would be to use AI in conjunction with human fact-checkers like journalists.
But honestly speaking, this hybrid technology has the potential to increase both the accuracy and the speed of fact-checking. Artificial intelligence (AI) can immediately indicate potential errors or inconsistencies, but human fact-checkers can offer the required context and subjective interpretation to make a conclusion.
Furthermore, this partnership might help reduce the amount of work that human fact-checkers have to do, which would then free them up to concentrate on more difficult instances.
Nevertheless, it is vital to keep in mind that artificial intelligence is not flawless and can potentially perpetuate biases; hence, it should be utilized as a tool rather than as a replacement for human judgment.
Graphics: Hannah May Manalo
Comments